Discussion about this post

User's avatar
jknightcrawler's avatar

My point is an industry that profits off women taking custody isn't going to stop prioritizing taking custody from men to suddenly stop using the industry that's set up to stretch out the conflict for lawyers. Dad taking custody rarely does that, and dad taking custody rarely happens. The people who aid the DA in false accusations to save them time are working in charities sponsored by the fucking DA. Don't tell me the DAs don't do this and it's one DA. That's also shit court employees like to say in order to lie about the actual nature of the court. "Oh we're not sexist, we act in the child's best interests." but the whole system isn't set up for taking kids from women. It's all DV charities run by women, staffed by women and whose statistical claims are never backed up by real data. There's no reason for shooting themselves in the foot. Is it possible this group of women are just bad parents? I mean I fail to see the profits behind this.

Expand full comment
jknightcrawler's avatar

Puhlease. Gender bias leans against men. These women have gotten so many stories written about them, but I have to wonder why a Satanic cult member gets so much coverage. The facr that there are gender prejudiced reporters ignoring an entire gender and the reality of family courts is shameful. That three women lost custody is not an emergency or tragedy. It only stands out, because it's rare.

Expand full comment
34 more comments...

No posts