My point is an industry that profits off women taking custody isn't going to stop prioritizing taking custody from men to suddenly stop using the industry that's set up to stretch out the conflict for lawyers. Dad taking custody rarely does that, and dad taking custody rarely happens. The people who aid the DA in false accusations to save them time are working in charities sponsored by the fucking DA. Don't tell me the DAs don't do this and it's one DA. That's also shit court employees like to say in order to lie about the actual nature of the court. "Oh we're not sexist, we act in the child's best interests." but the whole system isn't set up for taking kids from women. It's all DV charities run by women, staffed by women and whose statistical claims are never backed up by real data. There's no reason for shooting themselves in the foot. Is it possible this group of women are just bad parents? I mean I fail to see the profits behind this.
Or maybe you can explain how California has a "PA industry", who the players are and why they are supposedly working against a system that refuses to budge at all on protecting civil rights of men or children in every single other situation?
Maybe you can explain why all the experts claiming PA, the real ones with clinical experience not court employed lackees, exist? They're not getting paid by any "PA industry" right? That's not even possible.
So why would non marxist feminist drs disagree with almost solely marxist feminists pretending to be experts that never do any real science and claim constructivism is reality? Wouldn't it be more profitable to just go with the nonsense like you do?
There are no experts who aren't court appointed who say PA exists. It's the opposite. Nothing you say is accurate. Miriam Galindo is one of the players in OC. The other evaluator in this article.
Yeah, that's absolutely bullshit. I see real experts who have nothing to do with the court talking about it all the time on X. Clinical psychologists, with more education, experience and no ties to DV charities like all your "experts' I wouldn't wipe.my ass with the diplomas of, because they're probably xeroxed.
The ONE expose on these charities done involves some of the women and proves they push false accusations to alienate. I just read a story in a much larger publication than all of yours combined about Japan "Ending Parental Alienation". You're not the experts or the only ones talking about it, you're just only listening to what you want to hear.
Yeah it's called more than one voice from more than one source. Instead of just working as one coordinated, misguided and uninformed group of misandrist journalists pretending they're also acting in favor of children in men (some of whom don't even pretend) are not telling the truth JUST BECAUSE YOUR DUMB ASS SAYS SO. You keep challenging me even though I proved you wrong on DV and child.harm and child murder.. But somehow this plan to allow horrible mothers like some you inexplicably support *($$$) keeping children from men is beneficial. Except it's not. You want to solely remove a relief option from a falsely accusing state run rampant with dv charities who will recognize and acknowledge you have been abused but wont provide men services.
The biggest problem with that nonsense you just spouted is you know they essentially killed the only relief option for PA this year. I disagree with their methods, but I also fervently disagree with changing laws almost solely because a man did something one time. The shit women do is far more frequent and women are far more likely to abuse or kill their children than men.
why don't you just make every single 14th amendment violation that occurs in family court about parental alienation while you're at it and just do the fucking lying DV charities jobs for them?
You don't like PA, I get it, but fuck you for constantly attacking victims because you don't like it. That's not professionalism it's fucking bitter bullshit you pull on people because you can't control your reactions to people disagreeing with you about it. Not once have you ever provided a real excuse for this behavior, and none of you jackasses has ever disproved it.
If you stab me with a knife, did it not happen because it's not listed in WHO the way you want it to be?
Puhlease. Gender bias leans against men. These women have gotten so many stories written about them, but I have to wonder why a Satanic cult member gets so much coverage. The facr that there are gender prejudiced reporters ignoring an entire gender and the reality of family courts is shameful. That three women lost custody is not an emergency or tragedy. It only stands out, because it's rare.
It's more than three. That's just in OC. Robert spoke to over twenty just in OC. The rest of your comment is addressed in the last ten minutes of the interview.
All I see all day long is posts about these three women and it has been that way for years. I love that he talked to 0 men but you're probably still trying to claim women have it harder there. Don't make me laugh. The entire system is set up for women not men.
He's done stories on Liang case where it was the father falsely accused of PA. He recently interviewed David Segui. He did something on the Girard case. All of this I asked him about in the last ten minutes. Just in OC, we have covered Holburn, Grossman, McCracken, Cook and Black. That's five in OC. I've covered almost twenty in St. Louis County. Her Harbor, who I interviewed, advocates for domestic violence victims in Washington State. Project Pakua all around the country. California Protective Parents Association is another group which advocates primarily for female domestic violence victims. Are all these groups wrong? All have found that abuse is covered up by courts. All have found men are the primary abusers.
All rely on money that doesn't come if the truth is exposed. All rely on that narrative aside from a few interviews. Dv charities lose funding and end up being sued when it comes to light they promote false allegations. There are videos on youtube of DAs instructing people to falsely accuse in trainings, to save the court time having to actually investigate anything. I hope you never get falsely accused man. The awakening you will be forced through is not one I wish on anyone, nor should it continue. Promoting this nonsense is how they stay in business. Of course they want to be your friends. It's not that complicated until you make it complicated or call it x color unicorns. If the ONLY people you provide services to are females, isn't that going to effect your perceptions? Why is it they deny services to so many men anyway? Do men not deserve protection from violence or compassion when they are victimized? Are we merely scapegoats for everything and wallets for vultures, or are we human Mike? That is the question. If you side with the dv charities that only provide falsely incriminating, family destroying services like that to women, you know exactly what you are doing. You are being part of the problem.
My point is an industry that profits off women taking custody isn't going to stop prioritizing taking custody from men to suddenly stop using the industry that's set up to stretch out the conflict for lawyers. Dad taking custody rarely does that, and dad taking custody rarely happens. The people who aid the DA in false accusations to save them time are working in charities sponsored by the fucking DA. Don't tell me the DAs don't do this and it's one DA. That's also shit court employees like to say in order to lie about the actual nature of the court. "Oh we're not sexist, we act in the child's best interests." but the whole system isn't set up for taking kids from women. It's all DV charities run by women, staffed by women and whose statistical claims are never backed up by real data. There's no reason for shooting themselves in the foot. Is it possible this group of women are just bad parents? I mean I fail to see the profits behind this.
The parental alienation industry thrives from dads taking custody. You make assertions with nothing to back it up besides more assertions.
Or maybe you can explain how California has a "PA industry", who the players are and why they are supposedly working against a system that refuses to budge at all on protecting civil rights of men or children in every single other situation?
Maybe you can explain why all the experts claiming PA, the real ones with clinical experience not court employed lackees, exist? They're not getting paid by any "PA industry" right? That's not even possible.
So why would non marxist feminist drs disagree with almost solely marxist feminists pretending to be experts that never do any real science and claim constructivism is reality? Wouldn't it be more profitable to just go with the nonsense like you do?
There are no experts who aren't court appointed who say PA exists. It's the opposite. Nothing you say is accurate. Miriam Galindo is one of the players in OC. The other evaluator in this article.
Yeah, that's absolutely bullshit. I see real experts who have nothing to do with the court talking about it all the time on X. Clinical psychologists, with more education, experience and no ties to DV charities like all your "experts' I wouldn't wipe.my ass with the diplomas of, because they're probably xeroxed.
Real experts talking about it on X. OK well that settled it.
What you just described as your argument is called an "echo chamber" which is why you stupidly said no expert agrees that PA is real.
The ONE expose on these charities done involves some of the women and proves they push false accusations to alienate. I just read a story in a much larger publication than all of yours combined about Japan "Ending Parental Alienation". You're not the experts or the only ones talking about it, you're just only listening to what you want to hear.
Yeah it's called more than one voice from more than one source. Instead of just working as one coordinated, misguided and uninformed group of misandrist journalists pretending they're also acting in favor of children in men (some of whom don't even pretend) are not telling the truth JUST BECAUSE YOUR DUMB ASS SAYS SO. You keep challenging me even though I proved you wrong on DV and child.harm and child murder.. But somehow this plan to allow horrible mothers like some you inexplicably support *($$$) keeping children from men is beneficial. Except it's not. You want to solely remove a relief option from a falsely accusing state run rampant with dv charities who will recognize and acknowledge you have been abused but wont provide men services.
The biggest problem with that nonsense you just spouted is you know they essentially killed the only relief option for PA this year. I disagree with their methods, but I also fervently disagree with changing laws almost solely because a man did something one time. The shit women do is far more frequent and women are far more likely to abuse or kill their children than men.
Hey Mike, does most of your funding come from PA deniers by chance?
why don't you just make every single 14th amendment violation that occurs in family court about parental alienation while you're at it and just do the fucking lying DV charities jobs for them?
You don't like PA, I get it, but fuck you for constantly attacking victims because you don't like it. That's not professionalism it's fucking bitter bullshit you pull on people because you can't control your reactions to people disagreeing with you about it. Not once have you ever provided a real excuse for this behavior, and none of you jackasses has ever disproved it.
If you stab me with a knife, did it not happen because it's not listed in WHO the way you want it to be?
Really Mike? The PA industry? What the fuck is a PA industry?
Puhlease. Gender bias leans against men. These women have gotten so many stories written about them, but I have to wonder why a Satanic cult member gets so much coverage. The facr that there are gender prejudiced reporters ignoring an entire gender and the reality of family courts is shameful. That three women lost custody is not an emergency or tragedy. It only stands out, because it's rare.
It's more than three. That's just in OC. Robert spoke to over twenty just in OC. The rest of your comment is addressed in the last ten minutes of the interview.
All I see all day long is posts about these three women and it has been that way for years. I love that he talked to 0 men but you're probably still trying to claim women have it harder there. Don't make me laugh. The entire system is set up for women not men.
He's done stories on Liang case where it was the father falsely accused of PA. He recently interviewed David Segui. He did something on the Girard case. All of this I asked him about in the last ten minutes. Just in OC, we have covered Holburn, Grossman, McCracken, Cook and Black. That's five in OC. I've covered almost twenty in St. Louis County. Her Harbor, who I interviewed, advocates for domestic violence victims in Washington State. Project Pakua all around the country. California Protective Parents Association is another group which advocates primarily for female domestic violence victims. Are all these groups wrong? All have found that abuse is covered up by courts. All have found men are the primary abusers.
All rely on money that doesn't come if the truth is exposed. All rely on that narrative aside from a few interviews. Dv charities lose funding and end up being sued when it comes to light they promote false allegations. There are videos on youtube of DAs instructing people to falsely accuse in trainings, to save the court time having to actually investigate anything. I hope you never get falsely accused man. The awakening you will be forced through is not one I wish on anyone, nor should it continue. Promoting this nonsense is how they stay in business. Of course they want to be your friends. It's not that complicated until you make it complicated or call it x color unicorns. If the ONLY people you provide services to are females, isn't that going to effect your perceptions? Why is it they deny services to so many men anyway? Do men not deserve protection from violence or compassion when they are victimized? Are we merely scapegoats for everything and wallets for vultures, or are we human Mike? That is the question. If you side with the dv charities that only provide falsely incriminating, family destroying services like that to women, you know exactly what you are doing. You are being part of the problem.
I know about the video; it's one DA. I've written about it. https://michaelvolpe.substack.com/p/appearance-alert-on-with-ulysses That said, there is no bigger money maker than the parental alienation industry, https://theeprovocateur.blogspot.com/2018/10/the-parental-alienation-industry.html Your argument has no merit. It doesn't change what's been found in Orange County. You aren't claiming that it's inaccurate. From the DA to the courts, there is an attack on women there. I found the same thing in CT, St. Louis County, and other places. What is your point?
What comment? It seems my comment isn't getting posted a lot.