Vote Against Judge Kenton Skarin for 3rd District Appellate Court Judge in Illinois
Judge Skarin was the first judge in Jackie Sample's divorce, and he began the corruption.
When writing about the divorce case between Jackie Sample and Dr. Madison Sample, I previously focused on the relationship between Beermann Law Group, Dr. Sample’s attorneys, and Judge James Orel.
Prior to Judge Orel coming on the case, the first judge to be involved was Judge Kenton Skarin.
Judge Skarin will be on the ballot this Tuesday for an Appellate Court in Illinois in the 3rd District.
“He accepted Madison’s falsified financial affidavit stating that he made $12,000 per month,” Jackie says in the video at the top.
This was not a small oversight. Dr. Sample is a successful anesthesiologist. He’s been practicing for over thirty years.
He makes much more, approximately $12,000 per week, Jackie said.
Allowing this egregious lie reverberated throughout the divorce. By setting the income so low, Dr. Sample’s alimony was set much lower.
It also allowed Dr. Sample to argue that he couldn’t afford to continue to pay for the home they owned.
Judge Skarin did something even more egregious. Dr. Sample closed joint accounts and moved money into his own accounts shortly before filing for divorce.
That was both their money. Judge Skarin had a duty to make sure that Jackie had access to it.
“Judge Kenton Skarin looked the other way and allowed Madison to continue financially abusing me.” Jackie said in the video.
This strategy employed by Dr. Sample- of both lying about his income and of hiding assets- has left Jackie Sample in a precarious financial position.
“That set me on path for utilities being shut off, me not having food.” Jackie said in the video.
Jackie was entrepreneur when she met Dr. Sample. She had been a contractor.
She gave up her businesses- including a beauty salon on the far south side- to build their home in Burr Ridge.
As a result, she had no income when Dr. Sample filed for divorce. Moving all their money meant she had no money to live on.
Moving money from joint accounts into personal accounts is a strategy which was laid out in the virulent anti-woman book “Screw the Bitch.”
It’s a strategy many men have executed in their divorces, and good judges should recognize it.
Judge Skarin failed to recognize it.
I'm so desperately trying to figure out how someone who lives in essentially a mansion complains about not being able to buy food or pay utility bills. She chose to give up her career to relax and have someone else pay for everything. Suddenly they're divorcing and no surprise the woman is magically a victim, because "she says". No documentation to prove anything. And the worst part is it's all money complaints. Men get screwed like we breath in family court. Money is the least concern, despite men frequently being unable to live freely while paying some lazy bum who could easily get a job, or I dunno, could have not tried to retire early and chill and remodel a mansion how she wanted it? And this disgusting pamphlet you posted I'm sure had nothing to do with this matter. It's just lawyer tactics. Like false accusations for instance. Or claims of financial isues without any real documentation presented to prove it. You actually wrote a whole story to try and disprove me, and only made her look more a lying narcissist money grubber. Get a job, move on with your life. You're not a victim because you're somehow being treated like all men generally are in family court. And ffs stop reporting on this non victim every week. There's literally nothing interesting about this case, except that you inexplicably keep covering it and she keeps claiming (without actual evidence) that she should be getting more money and a mansion. For essentially trying to retire early. Nah.
I love your reporting