28 Comments

This could make for an interesting caseโ€”in Denmark's courts, not oursโ€”under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, especially because all parties and the court concede there is no final order. ๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฆ.๐˜จ., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hague_Convention_on_the_Civil_Aspects_of_International_Child_Abduction

Expand full comment
author

Maybe, but if they have an American court order, I don't think the Hague Convention applies. That's for parents who flee,like Narkis Golan, which I covered.

Expand full comment

Don't be so sure. The order is not final. ๐˜š๐˜ฆ๐˜ฆ, ๐˜ฆ.๐˜จ., ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ ๐˜ท. ๐˜ž๐˜ฆ๐˜ต๐˜ป๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ, 696 F.3d 92 (1st Cir. 2012) (reversing district court as to child previously held in the U.S. pursuant to temporary Swiss court order that was nonetheless worded to award "permanent" custody), ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ข๐˜ช๐˜ญ๐˜ข๐˜ฃ๐˜ญ๐˜ฆ ๐˜ข๐˜ต https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18434080658819286222

Expand full comment
author

https://michaelvolpe.substack.com/p/michael-volpe-investigates-special-838 I also covered this story which has a Hague element. Hopefully, you are right. If this reaches the Hague, I will cover it. I can even start a fundraiser to send me to the Hague. That would be fun.

Expand full comment

It will not be decided in the Hague. It's a Hague convention, but that does not give jurisdiction to the Hague. It would be decided in Denmark's courts, under their understanding of the convention, just as ๐˜๐˜ฆ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ was decided by the First Circuit in Boston.

Expand full comment
author

Denmark sounds fun also. My apologies for the mistake.

Expand full comment

Hands down, one of the most horrific examples of the โ€œSystemโ€ being weaponized by one of these โ€œunemployedโ€ C suite Execs. The way this child and all of their children have been and continue to be leveraged is unfathomable. ๐Ÿ˜ญ ๐Ÿ’” Thank ypu fpr continuing to bring these stories to light. ๐Ÿ™

Expand full comment
author

Hopefully, it will help.

Expand full comment

Thanks Joanna, our hearts are broken everyday by the system/

Expand full comment

This happens daily to men without paperwork, or being granted hearings, or being allowed copies of their own documents, while court reports are edited or destroyed, civil rights are an unattended nuisance solely for males, and it doesn't require millions. Just rampant false accusations, and it's not this incredibly rare instance involving a billionaire. It's every day to almost every man that participates in any family court action. Ignoring that or trying to make this seem like the norm compared to the constant stream of male and child victims created while women drain men to death for money, and to gleefully cause harm to their ex and child for financial incentives. Best part is they get to pretend to be victims forever, while still abusing their exs. Wonderful system, controlled entirely by feminists and corrupt paid officials.

Expand full comment

Actually Thygesen hired 29 attorneys, experts, PI's, and the Judge found no disparity between the parties. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HYFPM30a06pGxhdRvYCHe6uHOr_gQgrO/view?usp=sharing

Expand full comment

My ex hired a temporary judge, who engaged the supervising judge of the court to oversee my trial and give her orders in exchange for appearances to cover backed up court dates thanks to Covid.

Not only was I unable to obtain legal services from a non colluding lawyer, ever, because CARLA HARMS just intimidates them with her connections and the communications are not shared. The last one kept my file and two letters from Judfe Awoniyi who admitted she didn't know how to handle a complaint repeatedly, and then ultimately gavd it to the offender to claim he did nothing wrong. (James Mize). Judge Kara Ueda, the now supervising judge of the court repeatedly committed crimes in and outside of the courtroom in my case and now sits as the supervising judge of the court. She admitted she considers Harms a friend and that she would use her power to protect her from felony charges after my second hearing. I can't get a lawyer to finish filing a motion or to obtain a still missing copy of my visitation orders which were removed from my file, because Judge Winn ordered that I was not crazy, right before assigning a mediator I never met with because she had conflict and made statements about me prior to even meeting me. Not that the mediators in this court are anything but marxist feminists sending not so hidden messages to the judge and literally having no expert knowledge about the job they hold. Not that the charity ran across the street by the DA's office would help. They refuse all men who require services unless they identify as a woman.

Expand full comment

But true Thygesens ex partes are always ignored, but the Pro Se doing it? They crucify you.

Expand full comment

Oh Lucifer help anyone who doesn't hire a lawyer. They always defer to the lawyer, even if you continuously prove them wrong, or challenge their statements with actual case law they didn't make up on the spot.

Expand full comment

Haha , yup mother here.

Expand full comment

Sorry. Your situation sucks. I have been trying to push mainstream media to concentrate more on the primary corrupt actors. These rare cases don't really speak to how truly corrupt the system is, because at least in this case there is paperwork. Have they changed out orders or removed documents from your official file yet? If not, expect it.

Expand full comment

KEEP LOTS OF COPIES IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. I had my laptop finally break and the court "lost" or replaced a ton of documents, and even removed a hearing from the digital record.

Expand full comment

Harms whole argument is "he's mentally unstable" except theres been instances of neglect and abuse reported in 3 occasions while I was in supervised visitation, she's repeatedly been caught committing crimes and she has had ex parte communications in almost every hearing that I know of, except she hasn't shared any of them and when I asked corrupt supervising judge Kara Ueda for a copy of a communication mentioned in hearing but not shared, she refused to provide it.

There's ZERO justice for men. We often don't even get paper trails. At least in your case you can file documents and have them not disappear or be denied because the judge doesn't like your signature.

Expand full comment
author

You say this underneath an article where a man got sole custody ex parte of a child he'd never met. Truly idiotic

Expand full comment

Has he abused the child, or is he just moving with his son to Denmark for a high paying job and will raise him in a safe environment with far more resources and opportunity than she can provide being unemployed? If she's unemployed and her child is moving to Denmark, why doesn't she also move there? It's not like Denmark is Iraq. She wont be in danger or face persecution, and Denmark sits near the top of the list of happiest nations every year. And no, Hague is rarely applied. I know several UK fathers who married immigrant wives, who then ran with their kids to another country, like Poland, France, Japan (who recently rightfully made denying visitation and parental alienation against the law with legal relief options for fathers after decades of society shrinking sole custody policies), and former soviet countries, where they could give 2 shits about a father in another country despite of the child's wellbeing.

Expand full comment

Still his biological child. Still had parental rights, despite her attempt to deny them. Still got them. She can hire an attorney. That's what I am told by every single agency every time I try to report felonies with evidence.

Expand full comment

I hope to heck you're not suggesting ex parte insanity only occurs to this one FEMALE victim? The money required to make this happen is far too fucking rare.

Expand full comment

Wait, are you suggesting he's not the child's father? Or are you suggesting that TWO supervising judges of the capitol city of the biggest economy in the United States are less corrupt because they're not a "gay lawyer"?

Expand full comment

By the way, the court here doesn't ever apply rule FCC 271. Especially not for men. Don't expect fair counsel. That makes judges do paperwork. They're used to having their attorney buddies take temp judge spots so they can clear their calendar by lunch, and catch a back 9.

Expand full comment

Not to mention the court would have to pay for your counsel. Good luck with that.

Expand full comment

Lawfaire at it's worst is everything happening without paperwork, or shared communications, or ex parte filings, or even being in a courtroom. I should know. And Denmark or 15 miles away, which do you think is a more torturous situation?

Not to compete, it's just strange that women always seem to be such victims, and everything is more emphasized whenever a woman is written about. There's very little detail about what she said or emailed, but the family court doesn't even need emails to claim anything about you. They crininalize men without ever identifying a single act of abuse on a daily basis.

Also, buddy, it's San Fran, CA. It's not shocking that a judge might be gay. That he used that fact to help get his job is pure speculation. It's not like Newsome ever makes billions disappear earmarked for other projects, without any tracking of that money (not that the state auditor constantly calls out corrupt misappropriation and that the governor ignores it either) while claiming they're making an impact nobody, including the state auditor can find.

Project Roomkey was the "brainchild" of Mayor Dimebag Darrell Steinberg. Billions of dollars. Approximately 70,0000 a year per homeless person. Yet no metrics on who was helped, or proof anyone was helped in a meaningful way. When he holds town council meetings, in yhe capitol city of California, he pays ANTIFA members to create fake disruptions while facing scrutiny so he has an excuse to cancel the hearing. There is video of Katie Valenzuela (corrupt and racist voted out) and other council members signaling ANTIFA to start the chambers disruption so they don't have to answer questions.

Meanwhile, the AG was appointed by Newsom after the last was outed as corrupt. Funny, this one and his wife are far more corrupt. The week AG Rob Bonta moved from some office finance job to AG of the biggest economy in the country, Rob Bonta had the automated messages on the DoJ call reporting recordings to claim he is not responsible for overseeing any crime that occurs in a court, the BAR court which has no oversight (and was deemed a private corp by the supreme court, thus illegally observing immunity) or the BAR. This AG also tells their call centers to flag all corruption reports as mentally ill, and to ignore them. Funny, considering how corrupt his family is. His wife was the only real holdout in passing a law that made trafficking a minor a serious felony. But, this guy is here to protect us.

The concept of "vote them out" doesn't work in a state where a corrupt governor just willy-nilly appoints friendly corrupt people rather than running elections. Further, 2 party elections here are unconstitutional, but that's how they maintain power.

Court corruption involves a lot of major players, because billions move around due to the corruption solely. It's the exact reason the court actors and fem orgs are so desperate to block or cancel shared parenting. They can't pass around billions if they're not torturing children and parents and creating more conflict and falsely incriminating mostly fathers. That's the whole racket. The court needs to destroy one party to force them to fight back and engage all the services or they're not justifying their purpose or federal/state funding or grants. They have to lie, and criminalize innocent people for that money, while damaging the children at every turn with their intense greed.

Expand full comment

Thats a very long comment

Expand full comment

Sorry, I tend to be overly prolific.

Expand full comment