"Madison said" is your primary source for every bit of data. How does she have no information on any of the crypto they have, but knows how much it is worth? Has the home been inspected and appraised? If she quit her job to do what I assume you are arguing counts as employment she should be reimbursed for, did she keep records of hours worked, expenses etc?
Michael. Again. Veracity matters. Get more details please? I mean not just one account from one party? Official documents, redacted records, her work log if any. Without any supporting evidence, this case is likely to tank.
"Madison said" is your primary source for every bit of data. How does she have no information on any of the crypto they have, but knows how much it is worth? Has the home been inspected and appraised? If she quit her job to do what I assume you are arguing counts as employment she should be reimbursed for, did she keep records of hours worked, expenses etc?
Michael. Again. Veracity matters. Get more details please? I mean not just one account from one party? Official documents, redacted records, her work log if any. Without any supporting evidence, this case is likely to tank.
https://michaelvolpe.substack.com/p/michael-volpe-investigates-podcast-9b7?utm_source=publication-search it's in the original article you misogynist.
Except it's not. If it was you would be referencing it instead of just "Madison Said" you pink feather sellout