The Hartford Courant runs interference in Boyne case

Ed Mahoney blames Boyne for unconstitutional delays in his case.

Paul Boyne has now been in custody for writing mean posts on his blog, thefamilycourtcircus.com, for over eighteen months, and the local media took notice.

The Hartford Courant marked the occasion with an article from their hack reporter, Ed Mahoney. Mahoney got Paul’s name right, along with his age, but he got little right besides that.

Bond has been reduced for blogger Paul Boyne, who has been in custody for 18 months while awaiting trial on charges of cyber-stalking state judges with malicious internet postings.

It was unclear whether Boyne, 64, could post the bond, which Superior Court Judge Peter Brown set at $5,250 in cash deposited with the court, or a $75,000 surety.

Boyne had a bond reduction hearing earlier this month, but it remains unclear if the reduction will mean he will be released. He has little money and it’s unlikely he can come up with the reduced amount.

Paul, as I said, has been incarcerated for a year and a half for mean blog posts, but it is more specific than that. Connecticut law enforcement claims that he has made threats against judges, which rise to illegal threats. UCLA professor Eugene Volokh listed most of the offending posts.

Seems to be plenty in the arrest warrant to yield a jury question as to true threats: Judge Moukawsher “in the crosshair sight of a firearm” (¶ 17); “The judicial vengeance of Judge Moukawsher begs a .50 cal to the head” (¶ 18); talk of “assassinations” and “.50 caliber ammunition” (¶ 5); the items listed in ¶ 6; “is she beginning for a .308 shot to the head thru two panes of window glass from an oath keeper, concealed in the woods behind her house? A quick .50 cal to the head, delivered thru the back window of her car” (¶ 8); “worthy of a .50 cal to the head” (¶ 10); the Molotov cocktail stuff in ¶ 11; “Hunt Deichert!” and related material (¶ 12); “are there enough .50 cals for all the chosen heads in need of redemption?” (¶ 13); and more.

To convict Paul, the state has to prove these musings were true threats, or “statements where the speaker means to communicate a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of unlawful violence to a particular individual or group of individuals.”

No one really believes that anything Paul said about 50 cals and other supposed threats to commit violence were any more than jokes meant to get attention, however judges don’t like him.

They don’t like him because his blog has meticulously exposed their numerous misdeeds in Connecticut and other places.

The fallacy of family court is when the kids don’t play along with jewdicial discretion, the chessboard flips, pieces go flying, the game is over. All the pleadings, testimonies, evaluations, experts, legal fees, best interests rulings, go out the window when kids just say no. The Ambrose case exemplifies the constitutional overreach of jews like Jane Grossman, Gerard Adelman, Anthony Truglia who rape childhood forcing children to void the orders, flee abusive Christopher Ambrose, find safe haven of mother, then plead for relief from abuse in juvey court against respondent ogre father, where the court appoints counsel for all three kids, joining mad man Ambrose in suit. Big picture here is family court orders are the singular cause of child abuse, kids holding statutory legal remedy in juvenile court, seeking their own protection; judges of family court can be abusers too! No one saw that coming.

Three kids run away from Ambrose, leaving him alone in a quiet house, where he turns to his laptop portal to altered reality of scripts, pleading in rambling prose for the family court to arrest mother, have the Madison Police physically seize three children, incarcerate them in his lair in chains, or alternatively, if he cannot have his precious, then neither can mother, demanding the State place the children in foster care, mad man’s delusional mind believing his loving children are under the spell of witchcraft, where mother manipulates child psyches, creating zombies acting against orders of Judge Adelman. Blog consumer protection department advises it ain’t makin’ this shit up! Jewish ideology of family court perverts administrative no-fault divorce under color of ‘best interests’ to rape childhood, perform momectomies in violation Fifth Amendment’s substantive due process clause, imposed upon states by the Fourteenth, but jews eschew goy rights penned with a quill on old parchment. Trafficking children is a jewish delicacy!

The blog is racist, anti-Semitic, misogynistic and more, but none of that is illegal. Judges were paranoid that enough people might notice that they routinely give custody to child molesters and physical abusers, and they needed to shut it down.

Paul’s talk of 50 cals to judge’s heads was all they needed to put him into custody, which they did in 2023.

In early 2025, he remains in custody.

Part of a search warrant where Paul’s conversations with me were deemed evidence of more crimes.

The blatant violation of Paul’s first amendment rights is only part of the problem for Connecticut courts and prosecutors.

In the US, defendants have a right to “speedy trial,” but not Paul.

The Courant noticed, and they had to find a villain besides the courts and prosecutors.