Thomas Jefferson, he may be rolling over in his grave reading the motion filed by David Bartos
Shortly after I published my article last week on an Ohio case in which a man, David Kaschalk, being investigated in two counties for raping the mother of his son received sole custody of his son, the guardian ad litem, David Bartos, quickly rushed to the judge, Magistrate Caitlyn Nevin, to shut everything down. Some of his motion is below.
I’m no legal scholar but I would say these are marginal reasons to violate the free flow of information this country is built on, along with our commitment to open courtrooms.
This isn’t the first time this has happened. Something similar happened in Utah, but fortunately, that judge, Commissioner Catherine Conklin, shut it down.
Commissioner Conklin is still an idiot; we’ll see how Magistrate Nevin rules.
I know there are checks and balances on everything judges, lawyers and 3rd party appointees do. We know the 1st Amendment is the heart of this nation, so there is always a SCOTUS case to address the typical outraged 3rd party letter below. I was glad to see the caution used by the Utah judge as she upheld her oath on the issue of a free press. Judges can control their courtrooms but, decades of being on watch in the courts, I have witnessed the most heinous things happen to "wards" of Guardians Ad Litem doing what they do in secrecy in the Family Law, Dependency and Probate Courts. I don't know this case but, If the father in this case is a criminal, because he's a rapist .... it stands to reason that a rational judge and GAL, would err on the side of caution concerning placement of the child. If there is a real rape victim in this case, I hope she and the father receive due process and that all the evidence is proffered to a "criminal" court and is heard by a fair judge. My observations of Family Law judges is a knee jerk reaction to disclosures of crimes by victims of battery and rape. The maxim in family court is: Report abuse lose custody...for failure to protect or; report abuse lose custody for parental alienation.<Which is not a real thing, and judges don't know or don't want to know that parental alienation, is anything an abuser wants it to be. The risk GALs and Judges take with these beliefs and attitudes... is the life of the child. We have a death list of children whose fate was sealed by the horrendous rulings of judges who listen solely to the ridciulous, outrage, lies and fabricated evidence of third parties.
By using the child as an excuse to his lifetime shame of being identified in this case, they try to cover their barbaric actions of taking a child away from his mother. The same tactic was used in my case
I know there are checks and balances on everything judges, lawyers and 3rd party appointees do. We know the 1st Amendment is the heart of this nation, so there is always a SCOTUS case to address the typical outraged 3rd party letter below. I was glad to see the caution used by the Utah judge as she upheld her oath on the issue of a free press. Judges can control their courtrooms but, decades of being on watch in the courts, I have witnessed the most heinous things happen to "wards" of Guardians Ad Litem doing what they do in secrecy in the Family Law, Dependency and Probate Courts. I don't know this case but, If the father in this case is a criminal, because he's a rapist .... it stands to reason that a rational judge and GAL, would err on the side of caution concerning placement of the child. If there is a real rape victim in this case, I hope she and the father receive due process and that all the evidence is proffered to a "criminal" court and is heard by a fair judge. My observations of Family Law judges is a knee jerk reaction to disclosures of crimes by victims of battery and rape. The maxim in family court is: Report abuse lose custody...for failure to protect or; report abuse lose custody for parental alienation.<Which is not a real thing, and judges don't know or don't want to know that parental alienation, is anything an abuser wants it to be. The risk GALs and Judges take with these beliefs and attitudes... is the life of the child. We have a death list of children whose fate was sealed by the horrendous rulings of judges who listen solely to the ridciulous, outrage, lies and fabricated evidence of third parties.
By using the child as an excuse to his lifetime shame of being identified in this case, they try to cover their barbaric actions of taking a child away from his mother. The same tactic was used in my case
https://michaelvolpe.substack.com/p/michael-volpe-investigates-podcast-d5a#details indeed, Bartos dreams of the British system where any name can never be mentioned.
It’s very easy to get audio from any court proceeding