Something is not right in Orange County probate and family law courts. The price of justice is how much money one can afford to spent in legal fees …….so disturbing …
Not a journalist. No education in journalism. Opening a blog doesn't make you a journalist as much as you want the legal protections for this woman to extend to her. That's going to be hard to argue, even if you keep putting it in stories.
The problem Mike, is you keep automatically assuming these women are innocent. Julie and I once shared a private support group. None of the women in that group involved in family court were innocent. The only women involved who clearly were victims were those involved in probate matters and a couple families where a father was arrested for not tolerating the inhuman manner in which men are mistreated and enslaved by family court.
Let's keep pushing the false narratives though. That helps improve your veracity.
She's a journalist. The first amendment means nothing if you have to have the proper amount of schooling to qualify. Your distaste for her notwithstanding. You, with every comment, prove more and more that you are an awful misogynist.
You prove more and more that you know nothing about the women who you claim or try to frame as victims. Half of them are rich narcissists trying to get more money. If having common sense makes me a misogynist, I guess you have none.
Which women? The ones I already pointed out individually who I had contact and was in a group with listening to them lie and disprove themselves repeatedly? Or this one who is probably now lying about being in a group, because you know, accountability.
Which of them did I write about? How did they lie? This is the argument of a four year old. "I had conversations with lots of women who all lied about custody and you write about a lot of women. So, you write about liars " You're an idiot wrapped in a moron.
You have no self control, you lie in your reporting. You are sexist and try to frame anyone who calls your biases in reporting out as misogynist but you're a misandrist. You ignore mens plights for all these fake female victims. It's your bread and butter.
The first amendment means nothing to the courts Mike. If it did, I wouldn't be getting retaliated for it, cops wouldn't be showing up at my house to intimidate me over it and news corps would cover the corruption to make it end. The first amendment is dead to family court. You know this.
Thank you for your report Michael.
Something is not right in Orange County probate and family law courts. The price of justice is how much money one can afford to spent in legal fees …….so disturbing …
Not a journalist. No education in journalism. Opening a blog doesn't make you a journalist as much as you want the legal protections for this woman to extend to her. That's going to be hard to argue, even if you keep putting it in stories.
The problem Mike, is you keep automatically assuming these women are innocent. Julie and I once shared a private support group. None of the women in that group involved in family court were innocent. The only women involved who clearly were victims were those involved in probate matters and a couple families where a father was arrested for not tolerating the inhuman manner in which men are mistreated and enslaved by family court.
Let's keep pushing the false narratives though. That helps improve your veracity.
She's a journalist. The first amendment means nothing if you have to have the proper amount of schooling to qualify. Your distaste for her notwithstanding. You, with every comment, prove more and more that you are an awful misogynist.
DISPROVE ANYTHING I AM SAYING BEFORE INSULTING ME "JOURNALIST".
What you said is opinion. Obviously, Julie is a journalist since that's the argument FAC made. I get duber arguing with you.
And you certainly look more stupid. Mostly because you never disprove anything I say, ever.
Dumber would mean you are less capable of verbally speaking.
You prove more and more that you know nothing about the women who you claim or try to frame as victims. Half of them are rich narcissists trying to get more money. If having common sense makes me a misogynist, I guess you have none.
Name those women you are talking about. You hate women. That's the definition of a misogynist.
I wont name everyone from a private group for you Mike. I will call it out if you misrepresent non victims as victims though.
Which women? The ones I already pointed out individually who I had contact and was in a group with listening to them lie and disprove themselves repeatedly? Or this one who is probably now lying about being in a group, because you know, accountability.
Which of them did I write about? How did they lie? This is the argument of a four year old. "I had conversations with lots of women who all lied about custody and you write about a lot of women. So, you write about liars " You're an idiot wrapped in a moron.
You have no self control, you lie in your reporting. You are sexist and try to frame anyone who calls your biases in reporting out as misogynist but you're a misandrist. You ignore mens plights for all these fake female victims. It's your bread and butter.
No this woman specifically. Which is what I said. Did you even read what I wrote?
The first amendment means nothing to the courts Mike. If it did, I wouldn't be getting retaliated for it, cops wouldn't be showing up at my house to intimidate me over it and news corps would cover the corruption to make it end. The first amendment is dead to family court. You know this.
It means something in this case. Ask the FAC for help. They obviously thought this was a first amendment issue. Maybe, they'll consider yours.
I'm not a fake journalist thoigh Mike. And I'm male.