Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Luthmann's avatar

It's amazing how often lawyers need an education about the First Amendment. These folks are real winners - lawyer, client, and judge (Moe, Larry, and Curly).

Has Jackie tried a good forensic PI? I have a couple of guys that can track assets down nationally and internationally. Contact me offline if you need a names.

Expand full comment
jknightcrawler's avatar

The only thing I am confuse about here is, what logically entitles the woman to more millions of dollars? Giving someone half your assets because they're NOT going to be a part of your life any more always struck me as utterly insane. But, it's never just half if women can help it.

Greed is the motivator here. Did she pay for the house? Did she do a majority of the physical labor (lol no)? Then why the hell would it be logical to give her millions of dollars? She might be "homeless" after but she is still going to end up with more than enough money to live off of and buy a house. 'She thinks he makes about 50k a month" cool. Prove it. You have a giant house you don't want to lose, hire someone to prove it. But here's the thing. What exactly do you think you did to deserve a, by your estimate, 3 million dollar home? And no, shopping is not a job.

The victims you choose often don't look a whole lot like victims. Just rich women.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts