Check me out on The Frank Report

My latest musings on Paul Boyne are there.

I’m back on The Frank Report with an in-depth article on Paul Boyne’s case.

A recent search warrant filed by Connecticut State Police Detective Samantha McCord stated in part (mentioning me), “Within the recorded phone interview of Paul Boyne does not deny Volpe identifying Boyne with thefamilycourtcircus.com.”

If Connecticut can’t even prove he authored the blog posts it claims are illegal, the First Amendment be damned – then why has he been in jail, in maximum security no less – for over a year?

That’s a question I posed to State Police Detective McCord, the CT prosecutor Jack Doyle, and Boyne’s court appointed attorneys, Jennifer Buyske and Alice Powers of the Kirschbaum Law Group, and none answered it.

Paul is in jail for writing mean blog posts, and while many conservatives profess their commitment to the First Amendment, his case has received scant media coverage.

Locally in Connecticut, the only one to cover it is Ed Mahoney of the Hartford Courant.

Mahoney is a member of the semi secret Connecticut Judicial Media Committee, a collection of judges and media folks in Connecticut who get together to talk about things. What things? No one outside the committee is sure, however, numerous court victims who I have spoken with over the years believe this committee is responsible for pushing the narratives that court critics are “disgruntled”, “crazy” and “conspiracy theorists.”

Mahoney has called Boyne all three; he likes to call him “a notorious blogger.”

Part of the absurd search warrant filled out by Samantha McCord and approved by Judge Maureen Keegan in which Paul’s dislike for Jewish people is considered probable cause evidence a crime was committed. The search warrant allows the Connecticut State Police to search our emails and listen to our conversations, while Paul has been in prison.

I talked more about the “semi secret Connecticut Judicial Media Committee” with Susan Bassi last year. Susan found a similar collection of judges and media getting together in California.

Ed Mahoney, fourth from the top, is a member of Connecticut’s Judicial Media Committee. He’s the only from the MSM in that state to write about Paul’s case. Not surprisingly, he takes a pro judiciary slant.

In both California and Connecticut, these groups are used by judges to slant and cultivate coverage of the courts so that certain stories- like anything happening in family courts- don’t get covered, while the court coverage in general is favorable to judges.

Don’t forget to check out my previous story, which includes an interview with Paul. I expect him to be deemed incompetent this week and sent to a psych ward.