This just in: journalist pushes claim parental alienation is psuedoscience again, despite actual scientists acknowledging it as real, the WHO designating it as a suite of disorders, the blue bible of Psychology calling it the same, and defining behaviors, 120 years of case law in the United States and more in the UK. Your stories are as useful as purple unicorns. You label abusers victims, then constantly attack relief options for dad. Your problem with parental alienation is your paying clients are alienators and you would lose much of your reader base if you told the truth about how the family court actually operates instead of trying to frame every woman who pays and or sleeps with you as a victim. These same women routinely chose to harm their child, lost custody because they were doing so, and then shouted from the hilltops they were victimized, despite having no qualms about victimizing their partner or their child. The clear prejudice in every story you post is palpable. Stop being sexist in reporting for profit, please. This nonsense does nothing to alter laws. Further, did you just give yourself credit for a law in Arizona? Are you serious? Did you legislate? Did you develop high end donor relations? Did you co author the legislation? Did you even contact any reps to propose legislation? These women must be really stroking your ego.
Oops your affiliation with the AFCC racketeering criminal enterprise is showing. I think you don't want to lose out on the massive profits you make extorting parents and supporting child abuse and pedophilia. I am playing the world's tiniest violin for you right now. Volpe is not perfect, no human is, but he has balls of steel and you, lol, you are a TROLL!
Also, none of you have ever helped anyone but yourselves. Prove me wrong. And no, showing me a story you wrote that did nothing but you think it did, isn't proof. You keep pushing FRA lies, and you are influenced by morons like this that randomly call people pedophiles even though they are supposed to be journalists. Pathetic.
Further than just arguing Mike Volpe sent a parody account runner on his real account to harass victims for days until I revealed that Mike Volpe had put the man up to it. You are all sick.
Or wait you are that fake ass sexist journalist who refuses to respond to any male victims and literally spreads lies and hate so bad you got demonetized off youtube. You're a real piece of work.
When is the last time you actually wrote anything about a man more than once, in a setting that people would actually read it? Because your stories are always the same few women on rotation. You're also spamming FRA talking points, one of which is the insane hatred you have for a type of victims. That doesn't help anyone.
Oh look, a "victim" trolling males. The only thing here is you don't know me or what I know about Mike Volpe. You should also probably get mental healthcare. Attacking a random stranger on the internet and calling him a pedophile is actual insanity that women like you pull in family court, because you want control and money and to pretend to be a victim. Then if anyone questions your victimhood they are pedophiles or misogynists. Get over yourself.
Also you know the "Drs" pushing this nonsense are all lesbian attorneys in family court that push hate towards men and lie about statistics using a system of insane psuedoscience called "Constructivism", which involves no science. The prinicipals are, if you are an expert, what you say is automatically correct, no scientific method required. You don't pay attention to the BAR and it's attorneys in the big 3 countries including ours. What you don't know, is the exact same movements are being pushed along with further reducing any burden of evidence or truth. These "dr's" only represent women, so they can apply false accusations, ruining lives for an easy payout while prolonging the divorce so they can pad their already ridiculous bills.
I don't smear either. I have for a very long time pointed out your sexist nature. Hell the people you pointed out as only having female victims are only making money because of women. Women being the only victims or primary victims is a fantasy not backed by any science.
I never said women are the primary victims. I have said for a long time that I mainly do female domestic violence victims because I am primarily known for the Rucki case, a female domestic violence victim. Of course other female domestic violence victims will gravitate toward me more than other groups. I did say there are many female victims.
Many, which I agree with. But, I also have to point out the estimated over 70% of false accusations and the orders granted without evidence or due process because of them. When a person is claiming parental alienation under case law, they are seeking relief not only for their own 14th amendment rights, but for the rights of the child and their wellbeing. Of course there are people that misuse things. They work in the least ethical court that has become a business enterprize with no oversight and incredible profits. That doesn't erase or devalue case law or why that case law exists. However, when you spew lies about one of men's only relief options that mirror clearly harmful FRAs and base it on "you're lying" without any critical thought and then lie about the WHO acknowledging it, and then renaming it after SHERA falsified a report to UN WOMEN claiming and epidemic of violence against women, based on 35 cases, none of which they reviewed any case files for. They chose only those who fit their narrative and agreed with their claims. Mens cases were not present, or considered at all. Now, considering this is one of the few relief options for men in family court when they are commonly falsely incriminated without due process or evidence, something these same FRAs fought for, and considering they were paid for their report, please explain why the WHO changed the terminology other than to get FRAs off their back?
Secondly, only pasting a portion of the website and ignoring the language I posted (FRAs and DV charities all ran by women based false accusation profits) pushed for the change because it negatively effected their profit stream. This is why having zero men's charities is harmful to democracy.
They're not doctors. They are lesbian, openy, and they are attorneys. I just explained that. I don't make up anything. Your lack of research into the BAR imternationally and lack of knowledge isn't evidence anything I have said is true. Stop lying to the public.
You and I are not referring to the same groups. I was referring to the specific people pushing the changes, not the people being complained into doing it out of fake claims that women are victimized.
The biggest problem is all these doctors have no education in the things they are claiming. They aren't physicians, psychologists, or even psychiatrists. None of them are held to the standards of required continued education since 1985. The only oversight is the court, so they just push their anti family agenda with zero oversight while getting government funding and using that funding to pay for legislation. It's a circle jerk of monumentally corrupt proportions.
From the WHO website, "During the development of ICD-11, a decision was made not to include the concept and terminology of ‘parental alienation’ in the classification, because it is not a health care term. The term is rather used in legal contexts, generally in the context of custody disputes in divorce or other partnership dissolution." Not only do you spout BS but you have the chutzpah to claim otherwise.
"Following that clarification, comments and questions have persisted about the misuse of the term to undermine the credibility of one parent alleging abuse as a reason for contact refusal and even to criminalize their behaviour." Female orgs complained that it was used to abuse females, so they removed the specific terminology and renamed it. It's still a crime, and still abusive to the child and their partner, they just use a different classification because, you guessed it, female owned DV charities saw a threat to their profit streams.
My name is John Cortesi. Remember me, shit bird? Mike Volpe told me he sleeps with women he interviews. He has a child with one he thought was a victim. Big surprise she is doing exactly what all you women do with family court. You can't tell the truth from a FRA talking point because all the journalists you work with are FRA supporters. You fail to recognize thst FRAs aren't pushing for equality or the best interests of children. You jump on things happening and insanely claim somehow you caused it to happen. Stop echoing the bullshit the DV charities for profit and attorneys need you to so that nothing ever changes. Perpetuating the lies does not help children. It only enriches corrupt court officials, harms children, and perpetuates lies based off feelings instead of reality. Ms Fox was demonetized from youtube for hate speech, so I am not surprised her mentally challenged ass showed up with no argument and disgusting insults. It's all she is capable of, the hack.
I don't know your ex. And no we don't talk any more because I told you to stop calling me because you go out of your way to push psuedoscience and lies and you attack victims.
A victim is telling you that you are victim shaming, and that doing so causes harm. Do you really assume that your opinion differing excuses this behavior?
You're the only one and I've done your story twice, which is twice more than anyone else. I don't care what you say. I have my opinions on PA and I will not stop sharing them. You believe people need to report what you think is important or they are some kind of hack. You have a very twisted view of the world.
No, I know people need to report on the real problems and stop focusing on false accusing women and their false claims of victimhood. You never focus on what is important to effect change. You focus on niche victims and never why they became victims in the first place. Reality doesn't align with the narrative you all try to push with financial reasons clearly influencing what makes print.
Excellent reporting Mr. Volpe. I believe the cat is finally out of the bag on the house of horrors that is "parental alienation" and "reunification therapy". AZ Parent Adam Venetis recently spoke out along side brave Ms. Tori Nielsen and USA Today reported on it here. These con-artist pedo enabling monsters are being exposed and it's high time! https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/legislature/2024/02/27/some-arizona-lawmakers-want-to-ban-parental-reunification-programs/72630797007/?gnt-cfr=1
This just in: journalist pushes claim parental alienation is psuedoscience again, despite actual scientists acknowledging it as real, the WHO designating it as a suite of disorders, the blue bible of Psychology calling it the same, and defining behaviors, 120 years of case law in the United States and more in the UK. Your stories are as useful as purple unicorns. You label abusers victims, then constantly attack relief options for dad. Your problem with parental alienation is your paying clients are alienators and you would lose much of your reader base if you told the truth about how the family court actually operates instead of trying to frame every woman who pays and or sleeps with you as a victim. These same women routinely chose to harm their child, lost custody because they were doing so, and then shouted from the hilltops they were victimized, despite having no qualms about victimizing their partner or their child. The clear prejudice in every story you post is palpable. Stop being sexist in reporting for profit, please. This nonsense does nothing to alter laws. Further, did you just give yourself credit for a law in Arizona? Are you serious? Did you legislate? Did you develop high end donor relations? Did you co author the legislation? Did you even contact any reps to propose legislation? These women must be really stroking your ego.
"It's okay to insult hundreds of thousands of victims, as long as they're male."
The only people I'm insulting are the psychologists who push pseudoscience.
Oops your affiliation with the AFCC racketeering criminal enterprise is showing. I think you don't want to lose out on the massive profits you make extorting parents and supporting child abuse and pedophilia. I am playing the world's tiniest violin for you right now. Volpe is not perfect, no human is, but he has balls of steel and you, lol, you are a TROLL!
Also, none of you have ever helped anyone but yourselves. Prove me wrong. And no, showing me a story you wrote that did nothing but you think it did, isn't proof. You keep pushing FRA lies, and you are influenced by morons like this that randomly call people pedophiles even though they are supposed to be journalists. Pathetic.
Further than just arguing Mike Volpe sent a parody account runner on his real account to harass victims for days until I revealed that Mike Volpe had put the man up to it. You are all sick.
I did no such thing
.
Did you forget the phone conversations we had? Or did you just forget that this is John Cortesi?
Or wait you are that fake ass sexist journalist who refuses to respond to any male victims and literally spreads lies and hate so bad you got demonetized off youtube. You're a real piece of work.
I didn't get demonetized off YouTube and being demonetized is not a sign of anything but not following their random rules.
I didn't say you did. MS FOX DID.
https://www.amazon.com/Bullied-Death-Mackneys-Kafkaesque-Divorce/dp/1515337014 I wrote a book about a male victim..
When is the last time you actually wrote anything about a man more than once, in a setting that people would actually read it? Because your stories are always the same few women on rotation. You're also spamming FRA talking points, one of which is the insane hatred you have for a type of victims. That doesn't help anyone.
Michael Bean. Late last month. I'm not sure why you are so angry. I did your story.
Oh look, a "victim" trolling males. The only thing here is you don't know me or what I know about Mike Volpe. You should also probably get mental healthcare. Attacking a random stranger on the internet and calling him a pedophile is actual insanity that women like you pull in family court, because you want control and money and to pretend to be a victim. Then if anyone questions your victimhood they are pedophiles or misogynists. Get over yourself.
The WHO said no such thing. It said PA is not health care but family court strategy.
Also you know the "Drs" pushing this nonsense are all lesbian attorneys in family court that push hate towards men and lie about statistics using a system of insane psuedoscience called "Constructivism", which involves no science. The prinicipals are, if you are an expert, what you say is automatically correct, no scientific method required. You don't pay attention to the BAR and it's attorneys in the big 3 countries including ours. What you don't know, is the exact same movements are being pushed along with further reducing any burden of evidence or truth. These "dr's" only represent women, so they can apply false accusations, ruining lives for an easy payout while prolonging the divorce so they can pad their already ridiculous bills.
Lesbian attorney doctors. You're an idiot. You smear. You make things up and you don't understand the argument your opponents make.
I don't smear either. I have for a very long time pointed out your sexist nature. Hell the people you pointed out as only having female victims are only making money because of women. Women being the only victims or primary victims is a fantasy not backed by any science.
I never said women are the primary victims. I have said for a long time that I mainly do female domestic violence victims because I am primarily known for the Rucki case, a female domestic violence victim. Of course other female domestic violence victims will gravitate toward me more than other groups. I did say there are many female victims.
Many, which I agree with. But, I also have to point out the estimated over 70% of false accusations and the orders granted without evidence or due process because of them. When a person is claiming parental alienation under case law, they are seeking relief not only for their own 14th amendment rights, but for the rights of the child and their wellbeing. Of course there are people that misuse things. They work in the least ethical court that has become a business enterprize with no oversight and incredible profits. That doesn't erase or devalue case law or why that case law exists. However, when you spew lies about one of men's only relief options that mirror clearly harmful FRAs and base it on "you're lying" without any critical thought and then lie about the WHO acknowledging it, and then renaming it after SHERA falsified a report to UN WOMEN claiming and epidemic of violence against women, based on 35 cases, none of which they reviewed any case files for. They chose only those who fit their narrative and agreed with their claims. Mens cases were not present, or considered at all. Now, considering this is one of the few relief options for men in family court when they are commonly falsely incriminated without due process or evidence, something these same FRAs fought for, and considering they were paid for their report, please explain why the WHO changed the terminology other than to get FRAs off their back?
Secondly, only pasting a portion of the website and ignoring the language I posted (FRAs and DV charities all ran by women based false accusation profits) pushed for the change because it negatively effected their profit stream. This is why having zero men's charities is harmful to democracy.
They're not doctors. They are lesbian, openy, and they are attorneys. I just explained that. I don't make up anything. Your lack of research into the BAR imternationally and lack of knowledge isn't evidence anything I have said is true. Stop lying to the public.
Yes, there's no one at the APA, WHO, or any other medical group who are doctors or psychologists.
You and I are not referring to the same groups. I was referring to the specific people pushing the changes, not the people being complained into doing it out of fake claims that women are victimized.
The biggest problem is all these doctors have no education in the things they are claiming. They aren't physicians, psychologists, or even psychiatrists. None of them are held to the standards of required continued education since 1985. The only oversight is the court, so they just push their anti family agenda with zero oversight while getting government funding and using that funding to pay for legislation. It's a circle jerk of monumentally corrupt proportions.
Go check Michael. Go do some actual research instead of echoing female right activists' lies.
From the WHO website, "During the development of ICD-11, a decision was made not to include the concept and terminology of ‘parental alienation’ in the classification, because it is not a health care term. The term is rather used in legal contexts, generally in the context of custody disputes in divorce or other partnership dissolution." Not only do you spout BS but you have the chutzpah to claim otherwise.
https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/frequently-asked-questions/parental-alienation read it for yourself. Stop pushing BS.
I checked. I read what's on the WHO website.
"Following that clarification, comments and questions have persisted about the misuse of the term to undermine the credibility of one parent alleging abuse as a reason for contact refusal and even to criminalize their behaviour." Female orgs complained that it was used to abuse females, so they removed the specific terminology and renamed it. It's still a crime, and still abusive to the child and their partner, they just use a different classification because, you guessed it, female owned DV charities saw a threat to their profit streams.
My name is John Cortesi. Remember me, shit bird? Mike Volpe told me he sleeps with women he interviews. He has a child with one he thought was a victim. Big surprise she is doing exactly what all you women do with family court. You can't tell the truth from a FRA talking point because all the journalists you work with are FRA supporters. You fail to recognize thst FRAs aren't pushing for equality or the best interests of children. You jump on things happening and insanely claim somehow you caused it to happen. Stop echoing the bullshit the DV charities for profit and attorneys need you to so that nothing ever changes. Perpetuating the lies does not help children. It only enriches corrupt court officials, harms children, and perpetuates lies based off feelings instead of reality. Ms Fox was demonetized from youtube for hate speech, so I am not surprised her mentally challenged ass showed up with no argument and disgusting insults. It's all she is capable of, the hack.
I know who you are. I don't talk to you. You are repeating what my ex said.
I don't know your ex. And no we don't talk any more because I told you to stop calling me because you go out of your way to push psuedoscience and lies and you attack victims.
I have called you less than ten times. This is quite a thread you've created. You should read back some of the stuff you have written.
A victim is telling you that you are victim shaming, and that doing so causes harm. Do you really assume that your opinion differing excuses this behavior?
You're the only one and I've done your story twice, which is twice more than anyone else. I don't care what you say. I have my opinions on PA and I will not stop sharing them. You believe people need to report what you think is important or they are some kind of hack. You have a very twisted view of the world.
You attack victims and your excuse is "I don't like it". You have no room to be making negative assertions when being called out for your bs.
No, I know people need to report on the real problems and stop focusing on false accusing women and their false claims of victimhood. You never focus on what is important to effect change. You focus on niche victims and never why they became victims in the first place. Reality doesn't align with the narrative you all try to push with financial reasons clearly influencing what makes print.