While I have always had questions about the J6 bomber, including the placement of the two bombs as well as the bomber his or herself. IMO it was either a young man or slender woman, not someone with muscle or fat build up. I reached that conclusion based not just on his/her appearance but how they walked and held themselves.
Volpe is right to press Baker hard. Anonymous sources and unreleased analysis are fair targets. But Baker did not sound like a fraudster winging it from a basement. He described sources, video, ODNI reaction, CIA panic, Capitol Police angles, alleged training-exercise clues, and Blaze editorial/legal review. That matters. Journalism is not courtroom proof beyond a reasonable doubt. It is news gathering, verification, and publication in good faith. The lawsuit may punish the naming decision, but discovery could also blow open why the government took Baker seriously, why Cole’s case still has questions, and why January 6 keeps producing sealed doors.
Everything he has is based on anonymous sources. He may sound like he knows what he's talking about, but his evidence cannot be challenged or scrutinized because it's all based on anonymous sources. The GAIT analysis is anonymous. He accuses someone of a serious crime based on something which can't be scrutinized.
They said the same stuff about the vaccines in 2020. Is he wrong? Maybe. But I feel we must let this play out. In America, you have the right to speak and publish, and still be wrong. If he has what he says he has, it's good faith. "Guilty until proven innocent" is the surest way to kill a free press and the marketplace of ideas.
Vaccines are backed by data. He has an anonymous test of dubious validity if it was revealed. That's it, also Shauni is 5"7 and the suspect is about the same height. He has nothing. This is a mirage to accuse someone because MAGA wants the world to believe that J6 was an inside job.
“Dubious Effectivity” can describe the COVID vaccines when they were knowingly placed in circulation AND members of the press were punished for calling out their Dubious Effectivity.
While I have always had questions about the J6 bomber, including the placement of the two bombs as well as the bomber his or herself. IMO it was either a young man or slender woman, not someone with muscle or fat build up. I reached that conclusion based not just on his/her appearance but how they walked and held themselves.
Volpe is right to press Baker hard. Anonymous sources and unreleased analysis are fair targets. But Baker did not sound like a fraudster winging it from a basement. He described sources, video, ODNI reaction, CIA panic, Capitol Police angles, alleged training-exercise clues, and Blaze editorial/legal review. That matters. Journalism is not courtroom proof beyond a reasonable doubt. It is news gathering, verification, and publication in good faith. The lawsuit may punish the naming decision, but discovery could also blow open why the government took Baker seriously, why Cole’s case still has questions, and why January 6 keeps producing sealed doors.
Everything he has is based on anonymous sources. He may sound like he knows what he's talking about, but his evidence cannot be challenged or scrutinized because it's all based on anonymous sources. The GAIT analysis is anonymous. He accuses someone of a serious crime based on something which can't be scrutinized.
They said the same stuff about the vaccines in 2020. Is he wrong? Maybe. But I feel we must let this play out. In America, you have the right to speak and publish, and still be wrong. If he has what he says he has, it's good faith. "Guilty until proven innocent" is the surest way to kill a free press and the marketplace of ideas.
Vaccines are backed by data. He has an anonymous test of dubious validity if it was revealed. That's it, also Shauni is 5"7 and the suspect is about the same height. He has nothing. This is a mirage to accuse someone because MAGA wants the world to believe that J6 was an inside job.
“Dubious Effectivity” can describe the COVID vaccines when they were knowingly placed in circulation AND members of the press were punished for calling out their Dubious Effectivity.