This fits the larger pattern. Forman markets swagger as authority, then treats professional limits like technicalities. Kentucky’s rules do not allow lawyers to make false, deceptive, or misleading communications about their services. A claim that implies nationwide practice power through pro hac vice should draw scrutiny, especially if his website suggests admissions that cannot be verified. Add that to attacks on judges, inflammatory YouTube commentary, allegations from a former employee, the Preston fundraising episode, and the Matzkin defamation suit. At some point, these are not isolated lapses. They are a file. The Kentucky Bar should be asking questions.
This fits the larger pattern. Forman markets swagger as authority, then treats professional limits like technicalities. Kentucky’s rules do not allow lawyers to make false, deceptive, or misleading communications about their services. A claim that implies nationwide practice power through pro hac vice should draw scrutiny, especially if his website suggests admissions that cannot be verified. Add that to attacks on judges, inflammatory YouTube commentary, allegations from a former employee, the Preston fundraising episode, and the Matzkin defamation suit. At some point, these are not isolated lapses. They are a file. The Kentucky Bar should be asking questions.
He's a menace.