Appearances Alert
I was on two programs: talking about open courtrooms and transgenderism invading family court.
I made appearances with James White on Northwest Liberty News and on The Dark Outpost this week.
We were talking about the battle for open courtrooms with Jim on Northwest Liberty News.
This included the attempt in Ohio by scumbag attorney and guardian ad litem, David Bartos, to seal a child custody case where a man being investigated in two jurisdictions for raping his ex-girlfriend was granted sole custody. Bartos cited no case law in his brazen attempt to close the courtroom in that case.
In effect, Bartos was saying that he did not like my reporting and the case should be sealed as a result. Fortunately, no judge has sealed the case in this matter, yet. However, as I told Jim, Bartos’ motion has not yet been ruled on. There is an update in that case. Bartos is making a pretty penny for ruining kids’ lives.
Remember everyone, Mr. Bartos is doing his work for the children, but he’s also doing it for the nice paycheck. Bartos is court appointed, meaning the $8,340 he is currently owed is coerced.
In the broadcast, I also played this gem from Forsyth County (NC) Judge Gordon Miller.
Approximately three minutes in, Miller states, “What Mr. Boucher does is she swoops down and snatches up your children.”
Ms. Boucher is a Child Protective Services (CPS) lawyer. I didn’t know anyone at CPS had the power to simply swoop down and snatch up children- let alone a lawyer- but if a judge says it, then it might be accurate.
On Dark Outpost, I continued my exposé of the Marin School and their transgender agenda.
{I previously was interviewed by Ann Vandersteel on the Zelenko Report about the same subject)
We also talked about the notorious Younger case, including this hearing from 2021.
In this hearing, James’ mom, Anne Georgulas, tells the court that she started calling her boy a girl because when he was five he said he did not want to pretend he was a girl anymore.
The judge, Mary Brown, did not bat an eye, and she granted her sole custody.
Judge Mary Brown has granted full custody of eight-year-old James Younger to mother Anne Georgulas over the protests of father Jeff Younger, the latest order in a high-profile custody case.
For years, Georgulas has insisted that James identifies as a girl named Luna. Mr. Younger disagrees, and the two have spent much of James’ young life in court.
Brown, of the 301st Judicial District Court of Dallas County, awarded Georgulas exclusive control over James’ primary residence, counseling, medications, education, and extracurricular activities.
“Mr. Younger failed to timely make the payments of child support, medical support and interest as ordered and only paid his past due support after the motion for enforcement was filed,” the memorandum ruling reads.
I previously talked about this case with Ed Martin on the Pro America Report.
Overstock.Com, Inc. v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., No. A133487, at *51 (Cal. Ct. App.
Nov. 13, 2014) (“ Even though the court "ordinarily would order sealing" given the facts, it
ultimately denied sealing because the financial data had already been loosed into the public
domain in another case. (Id. at p. 1286.) ”) In Gilbert v. National Enquirer, Inc., 55 Cal.App.4th 1273 (Cal. Ct. App. 1997) a "wellknown
actress" and "public figure" (Melissa Gilbert) sought an order prohibiting her ex-husband
(Brinkman) from making hateful comments about her to the press, in particular during the
pendency of their divorce. Brinkman had allegedly threatened to destroy Ms. Gilbert's reputation
by disparaging her in the press about infidelities and substance abuse problems, if she did not
dismiss him from a defamation lawsuit stemming from his earlier interview with a tabloid. Ms.
Gilbert asserted that their minor child could be harmed if the threatened comments were
made. The Court of Appeal in Gilbert reversed the trial court's decision, holding that the First
Amendment right to free speech outweighs the right to privacy-even though neither Brinkman,
nor their child, were public figures. Gilbert v. National Enquirer, Inc., 43 Cal.App.4th 1135, 1138-39 (Cal. Ct. App.
12
1996) ("The July 4, 1995, National Enquirer headline announced, in large, italicized, and bold
print, that "Melissa Gilbert is a cold-blooded mother who forced our little boy to live in a car!"
According to the article, Brinkman had given "a scathing exclusive interview" in which he
accused Gilbert of being a "`deadbeat mother,'" of ignoring their son when he spends weekends
with her, and of forcing their son to live in a car when Brinkman became homeless following
the 1994 earthquake. The article further stated that Brinkman was the one who had fed their
infant son at night, that Gilbert had refused to enter their son's bedroom for fear of catching the
chicken pox, and that Gilbert had worn earplugs to shut out the child's cries. The article
contained other anecdotes by Brinkman concerning
Gilbert's alleged shortcomings as a mother.")
The Court in Gilbert observed:
While their son is the unfortunate bystander in this feud, we are bound by decades
of United States Supreme Court precedent on the law of prior restraints. The threatened invasion
to Gilbert's right of privacy and the threatened harm to her reputation are not the sort of
'extraordinary circumstances' required to justify a prior restraint. [Citation] Gilbert's remedy, if
Brinkman or the Enquirer abuse their right of free speech and press, is to file a civil action for
damages [i.e. defamation], as she has done here.